Patent infringement
Plaintiff and defendant work in the Eastern, Northern, and Western Districts of Texas, and selected other forums. Includes Markman hearings, IPR, and trial.

Practice Area
Litigation is a negotiation with a clock and a judge.
The Practice
Most intellectual-property litigation settles. The question is on what terms, and when. The firm's litigation practice handles patent and trademark infringement, trade-secret misappropriation, and licensing disputes, and works each matter toward the resolution that fits the client's actual objective.
Scope of Work
Plaintiff and defendant work in the Eastern, Northern, and Western Districts of Texas, and selected other forums. Includes Markman hearings, IPR, and trial.
Federal Lanham Act and Texas common-law claims. Preliminary injunctions where appropriate.
DTSA and Texas UTSA claims. Emergency injunctive relief and seizure remedies where warranted.
Royalty audits, scope-of-grant disputes, termination litigation.
Demand letters, mediated negotiations, and settlement structures that close the matter without the cost and exposure of suit.
Primary Authorities
A selection of the federal and Texas authorities that govern this practice. The firm's work is grounded in primary law, not paraphrase.
Common Questions
It varies dramatically by stage and forum. A case that settles before claim construction can run six figures; a case that goes through trial in the Eastern District of Texas can run seven to eight figures. We evaluate for resolution efficiency at every stage.
Inter partes review is a USPTO-administered proceeding to challenge the validity of a granted patent. Faster and cheaper than challenging validity in court, and frequently used by accused infringers as a parallel track to defend infringement litigation.
Less than five percent of IP cases reach trial. Most settle, and many resolve at summary judgment. We litigate to position the case for resolution; trial is one of several exit ramps.
Related Practice